Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2005 (English)In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, ISSN 1078-5884, E-ISSN 1532-2165, Vol. 30, no 4, p. 395-401Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Objective
To evaluate a new technique using a photoplethysmographic (PPG) probe for automatic ankle pressure measurements.
Design
Comparative study on two techniques for ankle pressure measurement.
Setting
University hospital.
Material
Thirty-five patients with leg arterial disease and eight healthy volunteers. Ankle-brachial indices (ABPI) were measured using conventional CW Doppler technique and PPG-based prototype equipment for the ankle pressure recordings.
Chief outcome measures
ABPIs calculated from CW Doppler and PPG ankle pressure measurements. The PPG signals were analysed both by visual judgement and by a software based, automatic algorithm.
Main results
The mean difference between ABPIs calculated from CW Doppler recordings and PPG (visual analysis) was −0.01 (limits of agreement (±two standard deviations) +0.16 to −0.19). The correlation coefficient was 0.93. When the algorithm was used, the mean difference (CW Doppler−PPG) was 0.05 (limits of agreement 0.28 to −0.18, r=0.89).
Conclusions
The PPG method is a promising technique with an inherent potential for automatisation of the ankle pressure measurements, thereby reducing the observer-dependency in ABPI recordings.
Keywords
photoplethysmography, ankle, blood pressure determination, ultrasonography, Doppler
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-30084 (URN)10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.05.012 (DOI)15964772 (PubMedID)15552 (Local ID)15552 (Archive number)15552 (OAI)
2009-10-092009-10-092017-12-13Bibliographically approved